Rather, it's more akin to an M Sport or V-Series. I was curious if the added power could make it into a true sports sedan, though Infiniti executives were clear that the car isn't looking to duel with the M3/C63/CTS-V set. I didn't get the chance to drive either the four-banger or the 300-hp car, but it was the RWD Red Sport 400 that I wanted anyhow. It wants to be a luxury carmaker, but doesn't seem to be willing to invest the necessary dollars in R&D and top-flight talent to compete. Infiniti once gave us playful cars like the G35 and even the FX, but these days it suffers a crisis of identity and intent. It's enjoyable exactly because of its imperfections. The Caddy is all about true-blue performance, while the Red Sport 400 is entertaining in the same way as a Camaro from the 1970s. The Q50 400 isn't good in the way a Cadillac CTS-V is good. The kinds of fun where tenths of seconds don't matter and bad things will happen in empty parking lots and at deserted four-way stop signs. It can't compete against the truly fast and stellar sports sedans in the segment, and yet it is the Q50's failings that make it different and fun. It is the most amped-up Infiniti we'll see anytime soon, since the GT-R-powered Eau Rouge concept will never go in to production.Īfter spending a day with the Red Sport, my takeaway is unexpected. Somebody in HQ must agree, as we now get the Q50 Red Sport 400, a 400-horsepower variation of the milquetoast sedan. Anything to help shake up the sleepy carmaker. In that case, more go-go juice can only improve the brand's cars. Despite the seeming allure of all-you-can-eat Vegas buffets and the Dodge Hellcat, more is not always better. You can't make a so-so car great by simply adding horsepower.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |